Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Topic:
Politicians smarter than scientists when it comes to ITER in France #31; new book: Fusion Barrier Principle
Replies:
3
Last Post:
Jun 19, 2009 3:54 AM




Re: Politicians smarter than scientists when it comes to ITER in France #31; new book: Fusion Barrier Principle
Posted:
Jun 19, 2009 3:11 AM


Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I think the politicians who have scuttled ITER recently are reading > the chapters of my book on the Fusion Barrier Principle. And > scientists > as well, for in the recent BBC report they showed a Italian scientist > who is doing "muon cold fusion" and saying that incremental > advances and not the all out ITER flop. > > The Fusion Barrier Principle was proposed by me in 1997 after > discussing > with Rick Spielman about fusion feasibility. > > In 1997, I had the notion that grew into the idea that in order to > control Fusion, you had to use the Maxwell Equations and that fusion > energy itself is the Maxwell Equations of the Coulomb force. > To control fusion you use the Faraday's law or Ampere's law. > The fusion itself is Coulomb's law. > > So, what is ITER or any tokamak? It is one Maxwell law controlling > another Maxwell law. It all reduces to the mathematics of enclosing > a sphere inside a cylinder. The maximum surface area and volume > is 2/3. > > The maximum breakeven energy by any tokamak or any > fusion device is going to be 2/3 breakeven. > > There will never be a Fusion Energy Power Station because > every fusion machine requires 1/3 of all the energy put into it, > going into controlling of the machine. > > The Coulomb law is a sphere, and the Faraday law is the cylinder > of controlling the sphere. > > A hydrogen bomb is a fusion instrument but not a fusion machine > since it is uncontrollable. The moment you want to control a fusion > bomb, you will need more energy than the bomb blast itself by a > factor of 1/3 more. > > The Sun is a controlled fusion machine, but the amount of fusion > is only about 25% of the total energy output of the Sun. > > So the smallest controllable fusion machine that can be built > is the smallest shining star. > > Does the fields of France where ITER is slated to be built, do > those fields have room for a smallest shining star? > > Archimedes Plutonium > www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies
Whenever I read something from Archimedes Plutonion I always think: "how do you made a fruit cordial?", for which the answer is "be nice to me".
Q
 Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration, don't fail me now!



