Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: The non existence of p'th root of any prime number, for (p>2) prime
Posted:
Oct 7, 2017 5:40 AM


On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 1:25:07 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote: > Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 11:43:09 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin: > > On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 12:01:42 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote: > > > Den söndag 19 februari 2017 kl. 18:30:04 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin: > > > > Why does the trustiness of Fermat's last theorem implies directly the non existence of the real positive arithmetical p'th root of any prime number > > > > ($\sqrt[p]{q}$)? > > > > > > > > Where (p) is odd prime number, and (q) is prime number > > > > > > > > It is an easy task for school students NOW! > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Bassam King Karzeddin > > > > 19/02/17 > > > > > > It is trivial to show that they do exist, considering it is trivial to use newtonraphner method to create a cauchy sequence that converges to it. > > > > Newtonraphner! Cauchy sequences! Deadkin's cuts! Origami! Paper folding. ....etc, wouldn't create you any of my alleged fiction angles in any imaginable universe > > Because the ignorance in perfect mathematics is well established globally and beyond any limit for more than sure > > > > But I know how does it work fictionally in those little skulls > > > > BKK > > Just because you do not understand those things doesn't mean it doesn't work. And actually using all those we can create it all, again it is extremely simple. > > > which damn logic is that? wonder! > > The one and only. > > Take the set of cauchy sequences of rational numbers modulo null sequences and you got real numbers, which includes all of the roots you spoke off. It is an easy construct. > > Take the dedekindmacneille completion of rational numbers, same thing there. Here we can construct the lower cut by having p^n<q to get the n'th root of q. > > Etc, your ignorance is staggering.
Define what is the null sequence you a real Troll? wonder!
there isn't any p'th root for any prime number moron (except in the fictional wellfabricated and established mathematics), where (p) is an odd prime number
If you can't understand the simplest proofs presented and Published here, then you can't understand any logical result or conclusion
And it is well understood even by carpenters and even before BC, how to create a rational approximation for such an imaginable root that never exists absolutely
BKK



