Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Inquiry Based Learning at the University of Michigan Math Dept.
Replies: 8   Last Post: Oct 18, 2012 9:06 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Robert Hansen

Posts: 7,975
From: Florida
Registered: 6/22/09
Re: Inquiry Based Learning at the University of Michigan Math Dept.
Posted: Oct 15, 2012 5:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (1.9 K)


On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Louis Talman <talmanl@gmail.com> wrote:


> The ability to do so is important, because proof is central to mathematics. Those who can't distinguish between good argument and bad argument certainly ought not to be teaching mathematics. Even those who *can* do so but don't understand that proof is central to mathematics (and this includes many who mistakenly think that they want to major in mathematics) ought not to teach mathematics. (And the reason, I suspect, that the latter category includes so many who discover too late that they don't really want to study mathematics, is that too many of them make it through to become mathematics teachers. Allegedly, anyway.)

Agreed.


> The aim of the test seems to be to test whether students can differentiate good arguments from bad arguments.

The aim? The target is fine (as you wrote above), the aim is very poor. A survey format?

I would have asked...

1. Is this proof correct?
2. If not, why?

Bob Hansen



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.