On 8 Dez., 09:56, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <8fdbe5fd-0568-4163-9913-234b1a029...@10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 7 Dez., 22:28, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <3f5b25b6-ae3f-4a92-96dc-49f872d0c...@c16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > Correct. That is a valuable recognition! But an infinity that is less > > > > than a larger infinity forces to believe in such crap. > > > > So you now publicly admit that your whole "triangle" thing is crap! > > > -- > > > As its existence depends on actual infinity it is obviously a crap. > > The existence of actual infinities is irrelevant.
Wrong. You have the opinion that the existence of actual infinities is irrelevant, or more probable: You have not that opinion but you say that you had this opinion.