
Re: The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 11:36 PM


On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:05:38 AM UTC5, Tom Potter wrote: > "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:R_dnfVPcITNJXMnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com... > > > The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations > > >> http://www.livescience.com/26680greatestmathematicalequations.html > > > > It's pretty obvious that the author of that article is not up to date > > as he did not include the three most beautiful leading edge equations. > > > > Potter's Law: x = e^(i^n * m*pi) = e^(i^n * (i^n * > > k)) > > ( Modification Euler's Formula e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 to model being and > > becoming.) > > > > Trebert's Law: G=EMC^2 > > ( G / c^2 = energy1 * energy2) ( The Pope doesn't like this expression.) > > ( Modification of Newton's and Einstein's Laws to put God and G into the > > picture.) > > > > Archimedes Plutonium Law: V = i * (I" cos^2(A)) = I * R > > ( Modification of Ohm's Law taking Malus's law into account to model > > conductivity. ) > > > > And where is hanson's equation that models oscillators in a gravity field? > > > > I might mention that Trebert's Law seems to be flawed as > > it implies that the product of the energy of any two bodies > > is always equal to the constant ( G / c^2 ) > > > > but note that hanson's equation is simplier and > > works better the Relativity, > > > > Archimedes Plutonium may be on to something big, > > > > and Potter's Law is a bullet proof model > > of being and becoming. > > > >  > > Tom Potter > > http://tompotter.tel > > https://tdp1001.jux.com > > http://warpto.us > > http://thecloudmachine.tk
Too much time on your hands, dude? Oh, the joy of retirement!

