|
|
Re: The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations
Posted:
Jan 30, 2013 11:36 PM
|
|
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:05:38 AM UTC-5, Tom Potter wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:R_-dnfVPcI-TNJXMnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> > The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations
>
> >> http://www.livescience.com/26680-greatest-mathematical-equations.html
>
>
>
> It's pretty obvious that the author of that article is not up to date
>
> as he did not include the three most beautiful leading edge equations.
>
>
>
> Potter's Law: x = e^(i^n * m*pi) = e^(i^n * (i^n *
>
> k))
>
> ( Modification Euler's Formula e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 to model being and
>
> becoming.)
>
>
>
> Trebert's Law: G=EMC^2
>
> ( G / c^2 = energy1 * energy2) ( The Pope doesn't like this expression.)
>
> ( Modification of Newton's and Einstein's Laws to put God and G into the
>
> picture.)
>
>
>
> Archimedes Plutonium Law: V = i * (I" cos^2(A)) = I * R
>
> ( Modification of Ohm's Law taking Malus's law into account to model
>
> conductivity. )
>
>
>
> And where is hanson's equation that models oscillators in a gravity field?
>
>
>
> I might mention that Trebert's Law seems to be flawed as
>
> it implies that the product of the energy of any two bodies
>
> is always equal to the constant ( G / c^2 )
>
>
>
> but note that hanson's equation is simplier and
>
> works better the Relativity,
>
>
>
> Archimedes Plutonium may be on to something big,
>
>
>
> and Potter's Law is a bullet proof model
>
> of being and becoming.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Tom Potter
>
> http://tom-potter.tel
>
> https://tdp1001.jux.com
>
> http://warp-to.us
>
> http://the-cloud-machine.tk
Too much time on your hands, dude? Oh, the joy of retirement!
|
|
