The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Real-world example of the liar paradox
Replies: 6   Last Post: Jul 6, 2013 8:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Real-world example of the liar paradox
Posted: Jul 6, 2013 8:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 7/6/2013 6:29 PM, wrote:
> On Sunday, July 7, 2013 7:43:13 AM UTC+10, wrote:
>> Russel's paradox is nothing,
>> but a lack of proper verbal tensing

> Granted...
> The Set of all sets
> that don't contain themselves
> barring that set itself
> is a proper definition of a set.
> R = { X | ~XeX & ~X=R }

This is not a proper definition in
the usual sense of the word.

Remember, Skolem suggested that the
problem of "definiteness" associated
with Zermelo's original axiomatization
be dealt with by using only formal

Ax(x=R <-> Ay( (y in x) <-> (~(y in y) /\ ~(y=x))))

looks unlikely with regard to uniqueness if it
is instantiable at all, and,

Ax(x=R <-> Ay( (y in x) <-> (~(y in y) /\ ~(y=R))))

is clearly circular.

Of course, it is how one chooses to look at
what constitutes a definition.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.