The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Linea Gyrativa
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Dean Buckner

Posts: 27
Registered: 12/3/04
[HM] Linea Gyrativa
Posted: Oct 20, 2005 3:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Does anyone have any information about the "linea gyrativa"? I came
across it in a discussion by Suarez which I am attempt to translate from
the Latin.

Roughly, imagine a cylinder of unit length divided into two halves.
Draw a spiral from the top of the cylinder round to the bottom of the
first half. Then divide the second half into two quarters, and draw a
spiral round to the bottom of the first quarter. Then divide the other
quarter into two eights, and draw another spiral.

So you have a spiral staircase down the cylinder that gets progressively

Since there are an infinite number of such cylinders, and since the
length of each spiral cannot be less than the circumference of the
cylinder, it follows that the spiral is of infinite length.

Yet all on a cylinder of unit length. Suarez says this paradox
originated with Buridan.

And is anyone aware of the background to Suarez' discussion? It is in
section 5 of the 40th Metaphysical Disputation, about continuity and the
continuum. It was written in the late 16th century. Suarez seems to
accept the existence of an actual infinity of points or 'continuing
indivisibles' that give continuity to the line. He reconciles this with
Aristotle by saying

"Cum ergo haec indivisibilia dicuntur esse in continuo in potentia, non
opinor esse intelligendum illam dictionem in potentia ut excludit realem
existentiam, sed ut excludit realem divisionem.", which I translate as
"When these indivisibilia are said to be in the continuum potentially, I
do not think the expression 'potentially' should be understood as
excluding real
existence, but that it excludes real division.

And yet Suarez was a leading philosopher of the Jesuit order, who were
supposed to be hostile to such an idea.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.