A reply to Gerard Westendorp, but first some errata: I misspelled Joe Giaime's name, and the final E7 should have been an E6:
the Dynkin diagram of E6:
o----o----o----o----o | | o
In article <4563AA9F.firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gerard Westendorp <email@example.com> wrote:
>John Baez wrote:
>> I then went on to discuss the 120-cell, which gives a way of chopping >> a spherical universe into 120 dodecahedra. This leads naturally to >> the Poincare homology sphere, a closely related 3-dimensional manifold >> made by gluing together opposite sides of *one* dodecahedron.
>I am a bit puzzled by the topology of this.
To get the Poincare homology sphere, take a dodecahedron, and identify each point on any face with a point on the opposite face, in the simplest possible way. More precisely, identify each face with the opposite face after giving it a clockwise 1/10 turn! (Or, if you prefer, a counterclockwise 1/10 turn - but be consistent.) If you look, you'll see that a 1/10 turn (36 degrees) is the smallest amount of turning that can work.
When you're done, you'll see that four edges and four faces meet at each vertex.
As for the 120-cell:
>Anyway, if I just imagine gluing together dodecahedra, I get a >sphere that has an outer shell that is composed of an ever-increasing >number of dodecahedra. They don't seem to come together to a close, >like the pentagons do in a dodecahedron.
Well, they don't close until you "fold it up" into the fourth dimension. Did you look at these pictures?
As is well known, classical General Relativity does not constrain the topology of the spatial sections of our Universe. However, the Brane- World approach to cosmology might be expected to do so, since in general any modification of the topology of the brane must be reflected in some modification of that of the bulk. Assuming the truth of the Adams- Polchinski-Silverstein conjecture on the instability of non-supersymmetric AdS orbifolds, evidence for which has recently been accumulating, we argue that indeed many possible topologies for accelerating universes can be ruled out because they lead to non-perturbative instabilities.