> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:55:52 GMT, Michael Olea <oleaj@sbcglobal.net> > wrote: > >>Lester Zick wrote: >> >>Not not, who's there? >>Not knot who? >>Not knot not! >>All of which amounts to nought. > > Except truth. But I appreciate your opinion nonetheless. It might be > more interesting if you had anything to back it up besides opinion.
I did back it up, or rather, it backs itself up: it's a "tautological regression to truth", from first principles; science, not mysticism. But I guess I don't quite have the hang of the technique, so I'll have to defer to the inventor, or is it dicoverer, of the method.
