Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » amte

Topic: Re: Two Types of Division
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jim Kaput

Posts: 11
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Two Types of Division
Posted: Dec 21, 1997 7:58 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Bob, this is a response to your question re Quotative (sometimes called
"Measurement") and Partitive Division:
>Speaking of unifying and simplifying, that is why
>I teach "12 divided by 3" as meaning "12 has how
>many 3's in it?" I don't understand the labored
>distinction between the following two customary
>interpretations of "12 divided by 3"
>1. it could mean "having 12 widgets that are to
>be separated into 3 groups, so how many widgets
>will each group have?"; OR
>2. it could mean "having 12 widgets and giving 3
>widgets to each group, so how many groups will
>there be?"
>
>Am I missing something here? The distinction
>between these two cases of division to me
>seems trivial and worth far less than the time
>it takes to even explain it. Rather than creating
>confusion by insisting (to either kids or teachers
>or future teachers) that they understand the
>distinction, I prefer teaching it as I have come
>to explain it: that "12 divided by 3" means "12 has
>how many 3's in it?"


You are pointing to a classic distinction that is disacknowledged by formal
abstract arithmetic (same operation) - but not by an arithmetic of
quantities (different operations: Extensive quantity divided by an
Intensive quantity vs Extensive Quantity divided by an Extensive Quantity).
If you believe that childrens' mathematical knowledge arises from
situations and their actions in them, then you need to attend to the
difference between these two operations - because they are conceptualized
differently and hence are elicited differently in different situations.
They also yield very different treatments of "remainders," depending on
differences in the situations.

To see evidence of the huge differences in the ways children interpret
these operations, and large differences in performance, I recommend looking
at a paper I did with Max West reflecting several years' work on this and
related issues:
(1994) Missing value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting
informal reasoning patterns. In J. Confrey & G. Harel (Eds.) The
development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics.
(Research in Mathematics Education Series) Albany, NY: State University of
New York Press.

I recommend the book for teachers of teachers because multiplicative
reasoning is a place where lots of children fall apart mathematically
because our traditional approaches do not serve them very well. And the
reason for this is that traditional approaches do not acknowledge, and
hence run roughshod over, fundamental differences in the
experiential/action roots of their mathematical thinking.

Happy Holidays!
Jim K

PS A reminder to readers of this list: We have a tenure track position
position in an exciting R&D environment at UMass Dartmouth:
http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu/newpositions/mathedposition.html

Jim Kaput
Department of Mathematics
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth
No. Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300
Tel: (508) 999-8321 or 999-8797 (SimCalc) or 999-8316 (Math Dept.)
Fax: (508) 999-9215 (SimCalc) or 910-6917 (Math Dept.)
SimCalc Website: http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.