Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: N-dimensional complex numbers (2) :)
Replies: 11   Last Post: Jun 20, 2011 6:53 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 575
Registered: 2/10/09
Re: N-dimensional complex numbers (2) :)
Posted: Jun 19, 2011 12:59 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jun 19, 11:31 pm, Alen <al...@westserv.net.au> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 11:06 pm, Pfss...@aol.com wrote:

> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Alen <al...@westserv.net.au>
> > wrote:

> > >This will be my final attempt at 3-d and other complex
> > >numbers, but I think it is more promising than the previous
> > >attempt.

> >  Good! First define addition and multiplication so that you have an
> > algebaic field!

> An algebraic field for 3-d numbers doesn't exist.
> I have split the number into two 2-d complex numbers,
> which have the normal algebra of 2-d complex numbers.
> A non-algebraic algorithm unites these two 2-d results
> to produce a final result.
> Alen

If I understand your definition of multiplication correctly,
I don't think it is associative. For example, I get:

((1+j)*(3+4i+6j))*(4+3i+j) = (-3/5 -4/5i + 11j)*(4+3i+j) = 6i+56j
AND (1+j)*((3+4i+6j)*(4+3i+j)) = (1+j)*(19i+35j) = -16i +

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.