PD
Posts:
2,970
Registered:
5/25/05
|
|
Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Posted:
Mar 8, 2012 6:18 PM
|
|
On 3/8/2012 4:49 PM, Sue... wrote: > On Mar 3, 10:58 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com"<microm2...@hotmail.com> > wrote: >> Its substance shares dimensionality of space. But it is unidrectional >> or forward alone. >> All dimensions have two directions. Time does not. >> >> Mitchell Raemsch > > <<the four-dimensional space-time continuum of the theory of > relativity, in its most essential formal properties, shows a > pronounced relationship to the three-dimensional continuum of > Euclidean geometrical space. 1 In order to give due prominence to this > relationship, however, we must replace the usual time co-ordinate t by > an imaginary magnitude > > sqrt -1 > > ct proportional to it. Under these conditions, the natural laws > satisfying the demands of the (special) theory of relativity assume > mathematical forms, in which the time co-ordinate plays exactly the > same rôle as the three space co-ordinates.>> > http://www.bartleby.com/173/17.html >
Dennis, you've been replaced. There's an Irrelevant Link Bot (ILB - TM) that is already in full force here now -- Mike Cavedon.
|
|