"Bruno Luong" <email@example.com> wrote in message <firstname.lastname@example.org>... > "Michal Kvasnicka" wrote in message <email@example.com>... > > As always, very elegant solution, thanks! > > > > Can I have few additional questions: > > 1. the "ismember" function is the most time consuming function during the computation. Is there any chance to create some faster aleternative, see for example http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/306676#832549 > > 2. Will be possible just count the succesful permutations, without permutation generation? > > 3. Will be possible to prealocate variables "p" and "q"? For bigger dimensions the expanding is slower and slower? > > At some point, you should try it on your own to adap to you need. > > Bruno
yes, of course.,anyway thank you again for your help.