
Re: All math paradox it seems i understand, leave mathematic ok...
Posted:
Sep 24, 2012 3:51 PM


On Monday September 24, 2012 3:00 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > On Sep 24, 1:43 pm, Dan Christensen <Dan_Christen...@sympatico.ca> > > wrote: > > > On Sep 23, 3:55 am, "io_x" <a...@b.c.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Formalization of the problem > > > > > > > 1)Ep,C peC > > > > so C and p are constants [names] > > > > > > > C is the set of Cretan > > > > p is Epimenides element > > > > this (1) traslate prhase > > > > "The Cretan poet," > > > > in the math model > > > > > > > for now i not use "EC" [exist C] > > > > in formulas nor "AC" [for all C] > > > > because C is already one costant [name] > > > > the same for p > > > > > > > 2)ER,T (Aa,y aeC/\yeR(a)=>¬yeT)eR(p) > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > I'm having difficulty with your notation, but here, it looks like > > > "Aa,y (aeC/\yeR(a)=>¬yeT)" is supposed to be both a logical expression > > > AND an object that is an element of some set R(p). This is not > > > possible. > > > > > > E(R,T) A(a,y) [aeC ^ yeR(a) > !yeT] e R(p) > > > > forall a,y, a is a Cretin and says y then y is unTrue, says p > > > > everything all Cretins say is a lie, says p > > > > I think he's using E(CAPS) like you use SET(S) > > > > Herc
Do you know that in French, "Cretin" means moron...

