On 10/09/2012 06:35 AM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: > In <firstname.lastname@example.org>, on 10/08/2012 > at 07:56 PM, David Melik <email@example.com> said: > >> As stated earlier in the thread, any definition of the mind other >> than a mathematical point is broken down by Chandrakirti's sevenfold >> proof of emptiness and is shown to be an inaccurate, impossible >> model. > > ROTF.LMAO! You don't even know what a point is in Mathematics.
Congratulations. By contradicting Euclid's _Elements_' definition, 'a point is that which has no part' (unless you have a better translation,) and not understanding a description of Hilbert space, and using improper grammar (a full stop to separate two abbreviations that are a sentence fragment, and capitalizing 'mathematics' when it was not in the context of an academic subject,) you appear to be a poorly educated wack job. Maybe you think you are greater than Euclid, but you are not.