The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Linear approximation to certainty equivalent for small-valued random variable
Replies: 3   Last Post: Nov 21, 2012 5:21 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 517
Registered: 2/23/10
Linear approximation to certainty equivalent for small-valued random variable
Posted: Nov 15, 2012 11:22 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I'm following Keeney's interpretation of risk aversion at For a lottery involving the addition of a
small-valued zero-mean random variable x~ to a (presumably much
larger) offset x0, the definition of risk premium (equation 4.15) is
Taylor expanded (4.16 and 4.17) before dropping all terms beyond first
order (4.18).

I can see why this is justified in 4.17, but I'm not 100% sure in
4.16. Usually, higher order terms are dropped when small numbers are
raised to high powers. In 4.16 this case, would the reason be that pi
is small? It is after all the risk premium for x~. Since x~ is very
small, the expectation and the mean are small. x~ is the difference
between expectation and mean, and so it must be small?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.