Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 152
Replies: 53   Last Post: Nov 19, 2012 4:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,201
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 152
Posted: Nov 17, 2012 2:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Uirgil" <uirgil@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
news:uirgil-B4A0C7.11095217112012@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...
> In article <k88h5n$eeo$1@dont-email.me>,
> "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:

>> "William Hughes" <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1ec0c2cc-f926-4fd4-a413-37ba8809ea80@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

>> > On Nov 17, 9:59 am, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:
>> >> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:28bff553-f679-4e23-8932-a1fb42f1b364@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>> >>

>> >> > Note that *set* limits have some important properties.
>> >>
>> >> > Given a sequence of sets {B_1,B_2,B_3,...}
>> >> > then the set limit always exists (it
>> >> > may be the empty set).

>> >>
>> >> > If we have
>> >>
>> >> > A = set limit {B_1,B_2,B_3....}
>> >>
>> >> > Then
>> >>
>> >> > A is a set
>> >> > A cannot contain an element that is not contained
>> >> > in any of the B's

>> >>
>> >> Williams going around, in circles:
>> >>
>> >> It was already mentioned that it is wrong to use that specific
>> >> definition
>> >> to
>> >> solve the balls and vase problem.
>> >>
>> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Special_cas
>> >> e:_discrete_metric>

>> >
>> > The problem is the above applies to *any* definition of a *set* limit.

>>
>> But those definitions are a *specific* case of these:
>>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Sequences_of_s
>> ets>
>>
>> I sometimes wonder which planet you come from.

>
> Irrelevant Ad Hom noted!
>
> Actually, William HUghes' "definition" is quite carefully non-specific,
> and while it certainly includes both a lim_sups and a lim_infs, is in no
> way limiter to only those.
>
> So that, as usual, LV has things inverted.


The one who has got something inverted here is you.

You are again invited to stop the spam and disturbance and kindly get lost.

-LV




Date Subject Author
11/16/12
Read Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
trj
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
Ralf Bader
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
trj
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Virgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
gus gassmann

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.