Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Replies: 101   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 5:08 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Vurgil Posts: 38 Registered: 1/19/12
Re: Matheology � 154: Consistency Proof!
Posted: Nov 19, 2012 5:27 PM

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Nov., 01:15, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 8:04 pm, Vurgil <Vur...@arg.erg> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > In article

> >
> > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > Matheology 154: Consistency Proof!
> >
> > > > The long missed solution of an outstanding problem came from a
> > > > completely unexpected side: Social science proves the consistency of
> > > > matheology by carrying out a poll.

> >
> > > > As recently reported (see matheology 152)
> > > >http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/KB/Matheology.pdf
> > > > mathematics and matheology lead to different values of the continued
> > > > fraction

> >
> > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ = 0 (Cauchy)
> > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ > 1 (Cantor)

> >
> > > It is not at all clear that these expressions represent any continued
> > > fraction at all.

> >
> > One of the problems with attempting any discussion with WM
> > is the fact that he is unable or unwilling to define anything.

>
> I am convinced that you are intelligent enough to understand above
> expressions.
>

> > The idea that he is introducing complications
> > because when he is clear it is obvious he is wrong is
> > hard to resist.

>
> That is my impression of your reaction. But in oder to test it, here
> is the complete representation of the continued fraction C:
>
> C = ((...((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+... +)10^n/10)+...
>
> Now take the reciproce and find 1/C = 0 or 1/C > 1? Which one is the
> correct value?

Any such allegedly infinite continued fraction should be representable
as a sequence of truncated continued fractions:
C_0 = a_0
C_1 = a_0 + 1/a_1
C_2 = a_0 + 1/(a_1 + 1/a_2)
C_3 = a_0 + 1/(a_1 + 1/(a_2 + 1/a_3))
and so on, with C as the limit, provided it exists.

But WM's 'C' does not seem to be capable of any such analysis, and thus
is not a continued fraction, at least in any usual sense, at all, at all.

So WM goofs AGAIN, AS USUAL!

Date Subject Author
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 William Hughes
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/22/12 David Valdez