On Dec 23, 9:08 am, richardhoep...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I want to find the analytical minimum 'x_opt=argmin(x)' of the following function: > > f(x) = alpha * |c + x| + beta * x ^ 2 > > where x is a real number (x is_element_of R), c is a real constant (c is_element_of R), alpha and beta are positive real constants (alpha is_element_of R+), beta is_element_of R+), |?| is the absolute value function and ^ is the power function. > > Looks simple, but the absolute value function makes it somewhat tricky. As already mentioned, i want to find the solution to this minimization problem analytically, not numerically. > > I managed to split the optimization up according to the three cases x < -c, x = -c, x > -c, and solve each case separately analytically (by setting the first derivative to zero). > > For the three cases I have now the solutions x_opt = alpha/(2*beta) [for x < -c], x_opt = -c [for x = -c], and x_opt = -alpha/(2*beta) [for x > -c]. But how to 'combine' these solutions now to get the solution 'x_opt' (as a function of 'x') ? > > So i would need a function 'phi(x)' which delivers me 'x_opt' for a given x, 'phi(x) = argmin f(x)'. How does phi(x) look like ? > > thx in advance for any advice.
Plot alpha*|c+x| and beta*x^2 on the same graph. One minimum is at -c, the other is at 0. The minimum of the sum of the two functions is between their respective minima.