Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: what is considered 'abuse'?
Posted:
Dec 26, 2012 10:10 PM
|
|
On Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:56:20 AM UTC+2, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
> Tonicopm@yahoo.com writes:
>
>
>
> > Among other things, can be considered abuse: to post all the times
>
> > things unrelated to mathematics (a la Archimedes Plutonium), or
>
> > trolling/cranking around on certain, unique subjects
>
> > (Cooper=Herc=Julio, WM, Broil, etc.), more like a religious speech
>
> > than any honest serach for debate, discussion, interchange of ideas,
>
> > etc.
>
>
>
> Anything at all "can be considered abuse". I myself think it horrible
>
> abuse (of and on Usenet) when people endlessly go on about how silly
>
> patently insane people are with their mathematical blather, and for no
>
> apparent reason yell "IDIOT" at any and every piece of inanity they
>
> stumble upon. Happily, I can just ignore inane waffle of this sort and
>
> contemplate all the good things in my life in peace, leisurely sipping
>
> port and slowly sinking into the deep sleep of the content, drooling
>
> away with abandon in my trusty recliner.
That must be a very nice, though pretty cold, life in Suomi. Enjoy it, though I think it is a terrible, awful and horrible abuse to post nonsenses about drooling: disgusting.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@uta.fi)
>
>
>
> "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
>
> - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
|
|
|
|
