"Matt J" wrote in message <email@example.com>... > "Emrah " <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message <email@example.com>... > > TideMan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message <email@example.com>... > > > On Monday, January 7, 2013 9:25:09 AM UTC+13, Emrah wrote: > > > > isn't there anyone to answer this? > > > > > > Answer what? > > > I don't see a question, just a statement of the problem, which looks awfully like homework. > > > What have you tried? > > > In what way did it not work? > > > Show us the code you've developed so far. > > > > ok mate, dont get angry :) > > here is the code i have developed so far > > > > function objFuncPlot > > [x2, x3] = meshgrid(0.1:.1:10, 0.1:.1:10); > > %x1 and x4 is constant > > x1=0.1996; > > x4=0.2107; > > %calculating constraints > > [g1,g2,g3,g4,g5,g6,g7]=constraints(x1,x2,x3,x4); > > Set x2 and x3 to NaN where the constraints are not satisfied, e.g., > > G=[g1,g2,g3,g4,g5,g6,g7]; > infeasible=~all(G(:)); > x2(infeasible)=nan; > x3(infeasible)=nan; > > Then plot as normal
Error using horzcat CAT arguments dimensions are not consistent.
Error in fplot2 (line 8) G=[g1,g2,g3,g4,g5,g6,g7];