Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: how does polarization actually work Chapt15.37 base equation of all
physics is Area = LxW from Maxwell Equations #1129 New Physics #1249 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 3   Last Post: Jan 3, 2013 4:34 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,282
Registered: 3/31/08
how does polarization actually work Chapt15.37 base equation of all
physics is Area = LxW from Maxwell Equations #1129 New Physics #1249 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Jan 3, 2013 3:32 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Now I have two things on my mind tonight, 1)
how the Dirac equation is derived from the Schrodinger equation as a
compounding of the terms into area formulas. For example,
superconductivity is the compounding if Ohm's law
with Malus's law when we replace resistance in
V=iR with the Malus law.

And the second thing on my mind tonight is how polarization actually
works to turn unpolarized light into polarized light. I need to know
that because
a conductor is one in which the polarization is not fully that of
allowing all the light to go through but blocks some of the light,
whereas a superconductor allows all the light to go through and a
insulator is close to being a cross filter that blocks 100%. I need to
know how polarizing lens work because when a superconductor is cooled
to its transition temperature, it works because it is thence polarized
to allow all the messengers to travel through and signal the electrons
to move without resistance.

So those are two big questions on my mind tonight. Reading on the
Dirac equation I am fascinated by how Dirac needed a 4 x 4 matrices.
Now I wonder if that need for a 4 component is related to the fact
that a double transverse wave has 4 vertices, 2 vertices of E field
and 2 vertices of magnetic monopoles. Now the Maxwell Equations join
together space and time into one fabric, for the Maxwell Equations are
already relativistic, so I think I have to go back and see how or why
Schrodinger did not incorporate the Maxwell Equations into his
equation so that it would be relativistic. The answer probably lies in
the fact that the Schrodinger Equation was a outcome of diffusion
equation of Fick's law. And so, then I would have to go and see how
Dirac's Equation follows more the Maxwell Equations rather than
Schrodinger's equation. So in some sense, I would have to see if given
the Maxwell Equations and a concept of double transverse waves, that I
can derive the Dirac Equation without ever using or even knowing of
the Schrodinger Equation.

As for the polarization, I need to find out exactly what happens on
the atomic level when light is polarized. So far, my conceptions of
polarization involve only filters or reflection, but nothing that
tells me what is going on at the atomic level of interaction to create
polarization. Superconduction and resistance occur at the atomic
level, or molecular level and I need to reduce polarization to that
same level.

Google's New-Newsgroups halted a proper archiving?of AP posts, but
Drexel's Math Forum has my posts in ?sequential archive form as seen
here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.