Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations as axioms of physics solves rest-mass,
charge, spin, speed #1139 New Physics #1259 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Jan 6, 2013 4:25 PM
|
|
Alright, these are the five prior chapters of this textbook, and I am
finally getting to the point of
wrapping up rest-mass from using the Maxwell Equations as the axioms
over all of physics.
Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.35 explaining Space from Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.36 explaining the neutrino from the Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.37 base equation of all physics is Area = LxW from Maxwell
Equations; deriving both Dirac and Schrodinger Equations out of the
Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations as axioms of physics
solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed
I am back on this subject of rest-mass, charge, spin and speed of
elementary particles. Now of course, this time I have only 3
elementary particles in all of physics and that the neutrino is
dismissed of those three-- electron, proton, photon. So that Physics
is basically 3 elementary particles that compose a atom and that
neutrinos are energy, pure energy in dissipation in space. Neutrinos
are longitudinal waves. The electron, proton and photon are the only
three elementary particles that compose an atom.
Now the bits and pieces of information that I have now which allows me
to finish this research of rest-mass, charge, speed and spin is the
idea of the electron and proton and photon as "parallel plate
capacitors" coupled with the idea that the charge makes the electron a
closed loop wire, while the proton is a ellipsoid shaped object.
What I had before today was that the charge of physics is geometry so
the electron has to be a Hyperbolic shaped object such as a ring with
a hole in it-- a closed loop wire, and the proton had to be a Elliptic
shaped object such as a sphere surface or ellipsoid surface.
What I did not have is that a parallel-plate capacitor describes a
electron and proton (and even a photon).
Whilst doing the derivation of the Dirac and Schrodinger Equation out
of the 4 Symmetrical Maxwell Equations, that derivation not only
demands the photon to be a Double Transverse wave, but demands
something extra special. The mathematics of the Maxwell Equations of
its div and curl in partial differential linear equations is a
mathematics of area cross sections, or, in physics, that means
parallel plate capacitors.
Last night, as I was reviewing Halliday and Resnick of their
discussion on chapter 38, Electromagnetic Waves, on pages, 846, 848,
849, 851, 854 of 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics, 1988, one can
readily see, that physics on the level of the photon, electron and
proton is "parallel plate capacitors". Just the wavetrain of the
photon itself is stacked areas, and areas that are parallel plates.
So, previously, what I had was that the electron was a closed loop
wire to satisfy charge of -1 and the proton was a ellipsoid or bar
magnet to satisfy +1 charge. But I needed something more, I needed
parallel plate capacitor to finish up the full picture. For the
electron was not the closed loop wire, but rather the parallel plates
capacitor that stretches the plates into forming a closed loop wire.
The proton was not the bar magnet shaped as a ellipsoid, but rather
the proton was parallel plate capacitors forming a ellipsoid shape.
Now I have to revive Dirac's derivation of the magnetic monopole,
where he concludes 1 magnetic monopole = 137/2 (e) charges. Previously
I said Dirac was all wrong on this and claimed the electron had
500,000 magnetic monopoles equal to 1 (e) charge. I need to show that
137 magnetic monopoles is equal to 1(e) charge. Now that I have the
parallel plate capacitor as the actual electron and proton, the amount
of magnetic monopoles that makes up a 1 electric charge is in the
vicinity of 137.
And what I have to do for rest-mass, is to make it relativistic with
that of Space. That was my mistake previously. And this time I should
not repeat that mistake. So in the Lorentz transformations of Special
Relativity, time dilates and space contracts with speed so that all
speeds of light are a constant. Likewise for rest-mass. The proton is
938,000,000 eV while the electron is 500,000 eV but when we include
the Space occupied by proton and electron we end up with an equality:
938,000,000 x 1 = 500,000 x 1876
I forgot to include Space when we talk about rest-mass. For rest-mass
in New Physics is the number of magnetic monopoles lying in the
density of Space.
The reason that osmium and iridium are far more dense than oxygen
atoms is because compounds of those atoms of osmium occupy far less
space than does O2 occupy. So rest mass is a function of number of
magnetic monopoles per space.
The electron requires a Space that is 1876 larger of space than does
the proton. Both are composed of parallel plate capacitors as area and
both have 137
magnetic monopoles, but the area of the proton is 1/1876 smaller than
the electron.
Now mathematics has a similar picture with the sphere and
pseudosphere. The area of the sphere versus pseudosphere are
identical, even though the pseudosphere stretches to infinity =
10^603. However, the volume of the sphere is 2X larger than the
pseudosphere of equal radius. This tells us that the proton is a
sphere like object composed of parallel plate capacitors but all stuck
to the surface of the sphere and the interior is hollow.
So now I am able to resolve rest mass, having found that missing piece
to work with -- parallel plate capacitor.
--
Google's archiving of posts is biased towards attacks on people, with
delays in time and search engine bombing stacking. If ?anyone searches
for Archimedes Plutonium in the Google science ?newsgroups is likely
to not come upon current AP posts but rather?instead come upon hate-
spew stacking in front, rather than the current actual AP posts.
Organizations such as Docendi of ?science,niuz,biz or from Spacebanter
are given top priority even though they are inflammatory posts lacking
science content, and not representative of AP current posts, but
rather posts designed to scare away a reader from AP. In the past
months, a Google search for ?AP posts is nothing more than a gaggle of
hate-spew from niuz.biz to Spacebanter. These ?inflammatory posts even
hinder the proper Google archiving?of actual AP. ?Whoever is doing it
knows how to pick out inflammatory words and then couple that with a
AP post, so that a reader is repulsed. Whether they are employees of
Google or simply know how to manipulate Google archiving is unknown,
but when compared to Drexel's archiving we see how Google could
operate far better.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent and fair archiving of AP
posts for the past 10 or more years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
