Alright, these are the five prior chapters of this textbook, and I am finally getting to the point of wrapping up rest-mass from using the Maxwell Equations as the axioms over all of physics.
Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.35 explaining Space from Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.36 explaining the neutrino from the Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.37 base equation of all physics is Area = LxW from Maxwell Equations; deriving both Dirac and Schrodinger Equations out of the Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations as axioms of physics solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed
I am back on this subject of rest-mass, charge, spin and speed of elementary particles. Now of course, this time I have only 3 elementary particles in all of physics and that the neutrino is dismissed of those three-- electron, proton, photon. So that Physics is basically 3 elementary particles that compose a atom and that neutrinos are energy, pure energy in dissipation in space. Neutrinos are longitudinal waves. The electron, proton and photon are the only three elementary particles that compose an atom.
Now the bits and pieces of information that I have now which allows me to finish this research of rest-mass, charge, speed and spin is the idea of the electron and proton and photon as "parallel plate capacitors" coupled with the idea that the charge makes the electron a closed loop wire, while the proton is a ellipsoid shaped object.
What I had before today was that the charge of physics is geometry so the electron has to be a Hyperbolic shaped object such as a ring with a hole in it-- a closed loop wire, and the proton had to be a Elliptic shaped object such as a sphere surface or ellipsoid surface.
What I did not have is that a parallel-plate capacitor describes a electron and proton (and even a photon).
Whilst doing the derivation of the Dirac and Schrodinger Equation out of the 4 Symmetrical Maxwell Equations, that derivation not only demands the photon to be a Double Transverse wave, but demands something extra special. The mathematics of the Maxwell Equations of its div and curl in partial differential linear equations is a mathematics of area cross sections, or, in physics, that means parallel plate capacitors.
Last night, as I was reviewing Halliday and Resnick of their discussion on chapter 38, Electromagnetic Waves, on pages, 846, 848, 849, 851, 854 of 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics, 1988, one can readily see, that physics on the level of the photon, electron and proton is "parallel plate capacitors". Just the wavetrain of the photon itself is stacked areas, and areas that are parallel plates.
So, previously, what I had was that the electron was a closed loop wire to satisfy charge of -1 and the proton was a ellipsoid or bar magnet to satisfy +1 charge. But I needed something more, I needed parallel plate capacitor to finish up the full picture. For the electron was not the closed loop wire, but rather the parallel plates capacitor that stretches the plates into forming a closed loop wire. The proton was not the bar magnet shaped as a ellipsoid, but rather the proton was parallel plate capacitors forming a ellipsoid shape.
Now I have to revive Dirac's derivation of the magnetic monopole, where he concludes 1 magnetic monopole = 137/2 (e) charges. Previously I said Dirac was all wrong on this and claimed the electron had 500,000 magnetic monopoles equal to 1 (e) charge. I need to show that 137 magnetic monopoles is equal to 1(e) charge. Now that I have the parallel plate capacitor as the actual electron and proton, the amount of magnetic monopoles that makes up a 1 electric charge is in the vicinity of 137.
And what I have to do for rest-mass, is to make it relativistic with that of Space. That was my mistake previously. And this time I should not repeat that mistake. So in the Lorentz transformations of Special Relativity, time dilates and space contracts with speed so that all speeds of light are a constant. Likewise for rest-mass. The proton is 938,000,000 eV while the electron is 500,000 eV but when we include the Space occupied by proton and electron we end up with an equality:
938,000,000 x 1 = 500,000 x 1876
I forgot to include Space when we talk about rest-mass. For rest-mass in New Physics is the number of magnetic monopoles lying in the density of Space.
The reason that osmium and iridium are far more dense than oxygen atoms is because compounds of those atoms of osmium occupy far less space than does O2 occupy. So rest mass is a function of number of magnetic monopoles per space.
The electron requires a Space that is 1876 larger of space than does the proton. Both are composed of parallel plate capacitors as area and both have 137 magnetic monopoles, but the area of the proton is 1/1876 smaller than the electron.
Now mathematics has a similar picture with the sphere and pseudosphere. The area of the sphere versus pseudosphere are identical, even though the pseudosphere stretches to infinity = 10^603. However, the volume of the sphere is 2X larger than the pseudosphere of equal radius. This tells us that the proton is a sphere like object composed of parallel plate capacitors but all stuck to the surface of the sphere and the interior is hollow.
So now I am able to resolve rest mass, having found that missing piece to work with -- parallel plate capacitor.
-- Google's archiving of posts is biased towards attacks on people, with delays in time and search engine bombing stacking. If ?anyone searches for Archimedes Plutonium in the Google science ?newsgroups is likely to not come upon current AP posts but rather?instead come upon hate- spew stacking in front, rather than the current actual AP posts. Organizations such as Docendi of ?science,niuz,biz or from Spacebanter are given top priority even though they are inflammatory posts lacking science content, and not representative of AP current posts, but rather posts designed to scare away a reader from AP. In the past months, a Google search for ?AP posts is nothing more than a gaggle of hate-spew from niuz.biz to Spacebanter. These ?inflammatory posts even hinder the proper Google archiving?of actual AP. ?Whoever is doing it knows how to pick out inflammatory words and then couple that with a AP post, so that a reader is repulsed. Whether they are employees of Google or simply know how to manipulate Google archiving is unknown, but when compared to Drexel's archiving we see how Google could operate far better.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 10 or more years as seen here: