fom
Posts:
1,030
Registered:
12/4/12
|
|
Re: WMatheology § 191
Posted:
Jan 17, 2013 11:38 AM
|
|
On 1/17/2013 4:52 AM, WM wrote:
> On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>
>> In a similar way it seems to be
>> impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the
>> always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end.
>
> Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of
> all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all
> natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is
> another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all
> of them. Can you?
Then, do irrational numbers exist
transiently on a problem by problem
basis? (Vacuum energy numbers)
|
|
