|
|
Re: WMatheology § 191
Posted:
Jan 17, 2013 12:53 PM
|
|
On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> But, in failing to provide reasonable
> alternatives (that is the hard part), you
> do nothing constructive.
I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:
Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he
proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal
representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.
> You, however, simply whine.
I am not in position to save the world of mathematics. But I can show
where it has gone astray.
Regards, WM
|
|
