On 2/20/2013 4:15 AM, WM wrote: > On 18 Feb., 14:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Please answer as politely: Is there any n with no line containing >>> d_1, ..., d_n >> >> No. > > Please answer without using phrases like "all" or "totality" or > "complete collection" or "whole class" or "finished infinite" or "the > set": Can you name a union of FISs of the diagonal that is missing in > every line of the list?
You have rejected the basic meaning of most mathematics.
If, by union, you mean
where each of a,...,m is an element of some x,y, or z
then you are admitting a finite collection predicate.