Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: A Better Number System
Replies: 3   Last Post: Mar 6, 2013 1:33 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,320
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: A Better Number System
Posted: Mar 1, 2013 11:29 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 1, 3:25 pm, Hurtlin' Squirty <r...@ttlers.org> wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 05:32 PM, Tom Potter wrote:
>

> > A Better Number System
>
> > It is my perception that currently defined number
> > systems, including naturals, integers, reals, complex,
> > surreals, etc, present distorted views of reality,
> > are inefficient, and express quantities with
> > variable and too much uncertainty.

>
> That's because of the units involved. Hidden units distort our views.
> For example, my truck will go about 16 miles on a gallon of gas, which
> seems not so good. But what does that really mean?
> Let's simplify:
>
> (16 miles) / (1 gallon of gas)
> (1013760 inches) / (231 cubic inches of gas)
> (1013760) / (231 square inches of gas)
> 4388 / square inch of gas
>
> Now we see that the truck manages an impressive 4388 of something on
> just one square inch of gas! Without question, 4388 is a big number. And
> a square inch of gas is pretty thin. Probably one molecule deep. Almost
> nothing.
>



might run on cardboard cylinders?

Herc

http://www.chatzombie.com/Dragon.jpg



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.