
Re: Matheology § 224
Posted:
Mar 30, 2013 9:39 PM


On Mar 30, 6:10 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <59ee5691c4294fca86380244afc2c...@vv1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "Nothing" has value to some. > > But Ross's nothings do nothing for me. > 
No, heh, they don't. No they don't.
And while sci.math is a poor medium for mathematical exchange, still there are many who can see these simple truisms for what they are: observations of inference, and deduction, of our mutually defined structures, in the mathematics.
So, I then definitely recommend that those interested in mathematical foundations of our numbers draw a line before proving they can't.
Then, Hancher, you revel in finding perceived fault in others, where's your input? I'm only interested in the objective, thank you.
Regards,
Ross Finlayson

