
Re: Matheology § 224
Posted:
Mar 31, 2013 1:08 PM


On Mar 30, 10:32 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <d31775901759418aae126056d33cb...@la7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 30, 6:10 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <59ee5691c4294fca86380244afc2c...@vv1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, > > > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > "Nothing" has value to some. > > > > But Ross's nothings do nothing for me. > > >  > > > No, heh, they don't. No they don't. > > I rather doubt that they do much of anything for anyone but Ross. > 
EF: a CDF of N at uniform random, f = EF(1) as p.d.f., countable image of [0,1] BT sweeps the tree recently enough: field operations for the unit interval a definition or two of continuity let's not forget the conjecture on the Factorial/Exponential Identity a topology for N the mother of all wavelets a geometry of a spiralspace filling curve as natural continuum R as R^crown null axiom theory
Sets, numbers, geometry: These are mathematics.
And: they're directly applied.
And: they're all very simple.
So: find an application for transfinite cardinals.
Regards,
Ross Finlayson

