Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Difficulty with a proof in Baby Rudin
Replies:
4
Last Post:
Apr 9, 2013 4:14 PM



Paul
Posts:
780
Registered:
7/12/10


Difficulty with a proof in Baby Rudin
Posted:
Apr 8, 2013 7:33 AM


I have difficulty following the proof of theorem 8.3 in the 3rd edition of Principles of Mathematical Analysis by Rudin. The line I'm struggling with is: lim n > infinity [ sum(i = 1 to infinity) [sum j = 1 to n a_ij ] ] = = lim n > infinity [sum j = 1 to n [sum i = 1 to infinity a_ij ] ]
This doesn't seem immediate, and the way I prove this is by theorem 3.55. However, the whole statement of 8.3 seems immediate from 3.55 anyway, since you just need to arrange the countable number of terms a_ij into a single sequence and appeal to the absolute convergence.
So Rudin's exposition of theorem 8.3 doesn't help me. I can only follow it by using theorem 3.55 and I understand that his intention is to avoid theorem 3.55.
What am I missing?
Thank You,
Paul Epstein



