The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: telescopic technique?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Jun 7, 2013 1:33 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 95
Registered: 8/11/11
Re: telescopic technique?
Posted: Jun 4, 2013 10:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:11:49 -0700, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote:

> doesn't follow, exactly, but it is the same as the "tired light" idea,
> that their are "atoms in space."
> but many astrophysicists tacitly *assume* that "space is Pascal's ideal
> plenum;" go & figure!
> of course, it is also true that the distance swamps the blueshifting of
> the half of objects that must be going "away from Earthlings."

"Tired" light is sort of the idea, but not correct. What happens is that
light travels from distant points in a straight line. Because our
universe is a 4D hypersphere, light does not travel in our 3D space but
takes a short cut "chord" across 4D space. For that reason light from
stars arrives at our telescopes at a angle to our 3D space that more or
less depends on distance to the source. It is that multi-dimensional
angle that creates the so-called Red Shift, NOT "Doppler shift" due to
velocity which is a HUGE mistake.

I'd direct you to my website with some mathematics outlining my "Light is
Right" theory but there is something seriously wrong with the math that
hasn't been fixed yet. And it is soon to change to a different subject. I
am so clever YEAH! G=EMC^2

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.