The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jul 7, 2013 6:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Roland Franzius

Posts: 586
Registered: 12/7/04
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 3:24 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Am 07.07.2013 03:20, schrieb Ralf Bader:
> Am 07/06/2013 02:43 PM, schrieb
>> (For if one person can see it
>> as a paradise of mathematicians, why should not another see it as a
>> joke?)
>> The curse of the invasion of mathematics by mathematical logic is that
>> now any proposition can be represented in a mathematical symbolism,
>> and this makes us feel obliged to understand it. Although of course
>> this method of writing is nothing but the translation of vague
>> ordinary prose.

What may be the meaning of "curse" in this sentence? A Freudian slip?

>> "Mathematical logic" has completely deformed the thinking of
>> mathematicians and of philosophers,
>> Set theory is wrong.
>> I believe, and I hope, that a future generation will laugh at this
>> hocus pocus.
>> Yes, we do (WM)

[.. ]
> But here is another problem. I asked my computer to search the text of
> Wittgenstein's lectures for some strings. Result:
> "atirist" 0 hits
> "arody" 0 hits
> "incorporated" 0 hits
> "paradise" 4 hits, 3 on p.99, 1 on p.103, 0 with your alleged context
> "joke" 1 hit on p.169, not in your alleged context
> "curse" 0 hits
> "deformed" 0 hits
> "laugh" 1 hit on p.32, not in your alleged context
> "hocus" 0 hits
> The software detects strings extending over linebreaks. I hope in your
> interest that you can provide a substantiated explanation for this.

As we all know, he is not even able, as a lecturer, to cite the standard
definition of continuity in a logical correct sentence.

Perhaps one of those guys who write their university notes backward with
erratic jumps forward in some way and blaming their teachers.


Roland Franzius

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.