Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: (infinity) A real story
Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 11, 2013 6:48 PM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: (infinity) A real story
Posted: Oct 11, 2013 6:48 PM
 Plain Text Reply

In article <53564a63-6bb8-458b-aece-4cec651f1fb7@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Friday, 11 October 2013 15:27:19 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de writes: > On Thursday, 10 October 2013 16:35:29
>
> > Yes, there are monotone sequences of set. Yes, what you say about them is
> > rubbish.

>
> I only say about them that they are monotone sequences. In particilar the
> finite initial segments of |N are a strictly monotonic sequence. Without any
> single exception. You call that rubbish. I call it mathematics.

There are a lot more of us calling it rubbish that the one lonely idiot
miscalling it mathematics.

If that were all WM said about them, we could agree, but he also says
that any and ever union of such finite initial sequnces is itself a
finite intiial sequence, including the union of ALL of them, which is
the union of a sequence of sets which does NOT have a maximum member.

And for nested sequences of sets, like the finite initial segments of
the naturals, the union of a set of them can be one of them ONLY IF
there is a largest one, which occurs only if the set of them is finite.

But no finite set of naturals can be a largest possible set of naturals,
Since, if finite, it will have a largest natural member and that largest
member will have a natural number successor not in the set, so that that
set is not maximal after all.

At least not outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.
--

Date Subject Author
10/11/13 Ben Bacarisse
10/11/13 Virgil

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.