Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: (infinity) A real story
Replies: 6   Last Post: Oct 12, 2013 6:03 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 7,005
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: (infinity) A real story
Posted: Oct 12, 2013 6:03 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <f6db6e4d-801f-49f2-ba28-9fcf0ec3c62a@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:36:02 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
>

> > > Virgil desires that everything should exist. Therefore mathematics has to
> > > drop the principle of inclusion monotony?

>
> > Mathematics tends to drop any asssumptions when they contradict others
> > that mathematmics finds more valuable,

>
> But for an inclusion-monotonic set like the FISONs, this principle cannot be
> dropped as long as only finite FISONs are concerned.



WRONG! The limitation is based on on having only FINITELY MANY FISONS.
Or, alternatively, having a largest FISON.

WM's principle hold ONLY if there is either a finite set of FISONs or a
largest FISON in the list, but fails if either condition fails.

> Would you like to drop
> the condition that every FISON is finite too?


OUTSIDE of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, there is no need to
drop it.
What goes on inside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, only WM
can say.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.