Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: ? 360 Infinity and Theology (3)
Replies: 10   Last Post: Nov 2, 2013 5:11 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 14,622
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: ? 360 Infinity and Theology (3)
Posted: Oct 31, 2013 6:25 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 20:11:26 UTC+1, Virgil wrote:
> In article <3f6fc2c0-4460-4386-83b1-df55090737cb@googlegroups.com>,
>
> mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
>
>
>

> > On Thursday, 24 October 2013 19:47:28 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > I'd say that the union contains more than any single FISON. Which is not
>
> > > only possible, it's true.
>
> >
>
> > It cannot be true because in mathematics you have to prove that claim but you
>
> > cannot. Infinitely many unions of FISONs yield infinitely many FISONs but not
>
> > |N.
>
>
>
> But no one mentioned "infinitely many unions of FISONs", what was
>
> mentioned was one union of all members of any infinite set of FISONs.


Every FISON is a union of FISONs. There are infinitely many FISONs. So if mentioned or not, there are infinitely many unions that do not yield |N.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.