Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an
apology!

Replies: 15   Last Post: Jan 25, 2014 7:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Robert Hansen

Posts: 8,417
From: Florida
Registered: 6/22/09
Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Posted: Jan 17, 2014 8:48 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Crabtree <sendtojonathan@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> This is anachronistic reporting in the extreme! Nature magazine is in effect, not reporting history, it is re-writing it with its translation into a contemporary multiplication table with Hindu Arabic Numerals and zero as a number, not just a placeholder.

Also, why would a ?decimal? times table need to list the multiplicands 1 through 9 AND 10 through 90. Unfortunately, ?decimal? has been given two meanings. The base 10 hindu arabic ?positional? notation that we generally think of, and counting systems that have symbols for multiples of 10, like roman numerals. The significance of multiples of 10 in counting systems has a much longer history than positional systems based on powers of 10 (base 10).

I would call the counting systems (with symbols for multiples of 10) ?pre decimal?, not ?decimal?. While it is reasonable to suspect that they influenced the invention of decimal positional notation, they are not themselves anything of the sort.

Bob Hansen


Date Subject Author
1/16/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an
apology!
Jonathan Crabtree
1/17/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Robert Hansen
1/17/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Jonathan Crabtree
1/17/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
kirby urner
1/20/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Joe Niederberger
1/20/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
kirby urner
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Joe Niederberger
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
kirby urner
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Jonathan Crabtree
1/22/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Joe Niederberger
1/22/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Robert Hansen
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
GS Chandy
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Joe Niederberger
1/21/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
Joe Niederberger
1/25/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
GS Chandy
1/18/14
Read Re: 300 BCE Chinese multiplication table. Nature owes India an apology!
GS Chandy

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.