Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Looking for a simpler proof of weaker version of Szemerdi's theorem on arithmetic progressions
Replies:
0



Paul
Posts:
780
Registered:
7/12/10


Looking for a simpler proof of weaker version of Szemerdi's theorem on arithmetic progressions
Posted:
Mar 26, 2014 11:24 AM


Szemeredi proved that every subset of the natural numbers of upper density epsilon > 0 contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. If epsilon = 1, then this is obvious (to me). My question is whether there are any values of epsilon < 1 which allow Szemeredi's original elementary proof to be significantly simplified. Or is the argument equally hard for all positive epsilon? I'm struggling with the original elementary proof (as indicated in an earlier posting) and I'm wondering whether I can plug in the gap by arguing that we can assume epsilon < (for example) 0.9 by showing that we can quickly prove the result for large epsilon.
Thank You,
Paul Epstein



