Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Van Neumann Hierarchy
Replies: 13   Last Post: Apr 28, 2014 10:45 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David C. Ullrich

Posts: 3,161
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Van Neumann Hierarchy
Posted: Apr 26, 2014 2:18 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:13:43 -0700, William Elliot <marsh@panix.com>
wrote:

>The Van Neumann hierarchy is defined with transfinite induction as
> V_eta = \/{ P(V_xi) | xi < eta }.


Huh> That reminds me of the Von Neumann hierarchy...

>
>Within ZF, using regularity and replacement, how does one show
>that for every set A, there's some ordinal eta, with A in V_eta.
>
>It would suffice to show for every transitive set A,
>there's some ordinal eta, with A in V_eta.
>
>With that, since every set is a subset of it's transitive


You really really really need to stop criticizing others' English.
Or learn a little English yourself. It's "its", not "it's".

>closure, every set would be inside the Van Neumann hierarchy.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.