Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Replies: 19   Last Post: Jul 11, 2014 8:13 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 5,640
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Posted: Jul 8, 2014 4:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

there is an infinity of twinprimes
;as Arivaderci polonium would say,
the finitey of the primes if just a corollary

> Are there of it, infinite elements?
>
> Some have that as a consequence.
>
>
>
> This is a traditional proof of
>
> infinitude of primes, of which



Date Subject Author
7/5/14
Read Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ki Song
7/7/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ki Song
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ki Song
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ki Song
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his
argument:
ross.finlayson@gmail.com
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Brian Q. Hutchings
7/9/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ralf Bader
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil
7/11/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/11/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Ki Song
7/8/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil
7/10/14
Read Re: Discussion with WM: After 200+ posts, he finally reveals his argument:
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.