The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: § 534 Finis
Replies: 12   Last Post: Aug 16, 2014 2:28 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 16, 2014 12:49 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Friday, 15 August 2014 22:32:19 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> > What do you understand by my "misunderstanding"?
> Exactly what you said: that the sequence of cardinalities should have
> limit 0 if set theory was right.

In fact, if the set limit was the set at omega.

> Set theory says that the limit of
> cardinalities (we are talking about s_n here, yes?) is exactly what you
> expect it to be: oo

What are the infinitely many elements that the cardinality measures?

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.