
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted:
Aug 16, 2014 12:49 PM


On Friday, 15 August 2014 22:32:19 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > What do you understand by my "misunderstanding"? > > Exactly what you said: that the sequence of cardinalities should have > limit 0 if set theory was right.
In fact, if the set limit was the set at omega.
> Set theory says that the limit of > cardinalities (we are talking about s_n here, yes?) is exactly what you > expect it to be: oo
What are the infinitely many elements that the cardinality measures?
Regards, WM

