On Saturday, 16 August 2014 14:04:43 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > firstname.lastname@example.org writes: >
> Good idea. When you can't cope with the questions anymore, start a new > thread.
It's you who can't cope. Is Cantor's proof of transcendental numbers valid?
> an attempt to unravel > what Prof. Mueckenheim's means by the WMglish words "all rationals" and > "all naturals".
Simply consider whether Cantor's proof of transcendental numbers is acceptable. If you think so, then you know what "all naturals can count all algebraics" means. This meaning is contradicted by mathematics above.