Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Replies: 14   Last Post: Oct 2, 2017 6:05 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 7777777 Posts: 330 Registered: 11/4/16
Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Posted: Oct 2, 2017 1:29 AM

sunnuntai 1. lokakuuta 2017 23.21.58 UTC+3 Me kirjoitti:
> On Sunday, October 1, 2017 at 9:48:24 PM UTC+2, John Gabriel wrote:
>

> > SUM_{k=1...oo} (3/10^n)
> >
> > It is most definitely not the same as 1/3

>
> Well, actually it is. There's a simple prove for the theorem
>
> lim SUM_{k=1..n} (3/10^k) = 1/3 .
> n->oo
>
> Hence
>
> oo
> SUM (3/10^n) = 1/3 .
> n=1

are you trying to insist that 0.(3) is equal to
lim{n \to infinity} s(n) = lim{n --> infinity} 0.3 + 0.03 + 0.003 + ... + 3*10^(-n) = 1/3 ?

Using the real numbers 0.(3) is not equal to 1/3.

But it seems you have chosen to prefer eating the cake and having it too,
meaning you have rejected the infinitesimals but using them too.
That's why you end up with a falsehood 0.(3) = 1/3 in real numbers.

You should be able to check a simple arithmetic
0.(3)3 + 0.(3)3 + 0.(3)4 = 0.(3)(3)+0.(3)(3)+0.(3)(3) = 1
and therefore 0.(3)(3) = 1/3

Date Subject Author
10/1/17 Me
10/1/17 Me
10/1/17 Me
10/1/17 Me
10/2/17 7777777
10/2/17 zelos.malum@gmail.com
10/2/17 7777777
10/2/17 zelos.malum@gmail.com
10/1/17 bursejan@gmail.com
10/1/17 bursejan@gmail.com
10/1/17 Me
10/1/17 genmailus@gmail.com
10/1/17 bursejan@gmail.com
10/1/17 bursejan@gmail.com