7777777
Posts:
330
Registered:
11/4/16


Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...
Posted:
Oct 2, 2017 2:01 AM


maanantai 2. lokakuuta 2017 8.45.49 UTC+3 Zelos Malum kirjoitti: > Den måndag 2 oktober 2017 kl. 07:29:13 UTC+2 skrev 7777777: > > sunnuntai 1. lokakuuta 2017 23.21.58 UTC+3 Me kirjoitti: > > > On Sunday, October 1, 2017 at 9:48:24 PM UTC+2, John Gabriel wrote: > > > > > > > SUM_{k=1...oo} (3/10^n) > > > > > > > > It is most definitely not the same as 1/3 > > > > > > Well, actually it is. There's a simple prove for the theorem > > > > > > lim SUM_{k=1..n} (3/10^k) = 1/3 . > > > n>oo > > > > > > Hence > > > > > > oo > > > SUM (3/10^n) = 1/3 . > > > n=1 > > > > are you trying to insist that 0.(3) is equal to > > lim{n \to infinity} s(n) = lim{n > infinity} 0.3 + 0.03 + 0.003 + ... + 3*10^(n) = 1/3 ? > > > > Using the real numbers 0.(3) is not equal to 1/3. > > > > But it seems you have chosen to prefer eating the cake and having it too, > > meaning you have rejected the infinitesimals but using them too. > > That's why you end up with a falsehood 0.(3) = 1/3 in real numbers. > > > > You should be able to check a simple arithmetic > > 0.(3)3 + 0.(3)3 + 0.(3)4 = 0.(3)(3)+0.(3)(3)+0.(3)(3) = 1 > > and therefore 0.(3)(3) = 1/3 > > Hey moron! Nice to see you :) I still see you are using horseshit notation that you cannot even define coherently! > > !/3=0.(3) is trivial to prove for real numbers.
let me see if I remember you.....hmmm, you must be the one who got everything wrong at statu, right? And never admit your mistakes.
You must feel lonely here at the big world with no support from your fellow fools. Still the same bullshit and ridicule going on every day....must be great never to achieve anything and live with delusions.

