Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Synthetic Geometry proof and Analytical Geometry proof that Conic is a Oval, never an ellipse// yes Apollonius was wrong
Replies:
5
Last Post:
Oct 7, 2017 1:48 AM



Me
Posts:
1,716
Registered:
1/23/16


Re: mounting evidence Re: ..proof that Conic is a Oval, never an ellipse// yes Apollonius was wrong
Posted:
Oct 6, 2017 2:52 PM


On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 12:02:40 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now we have ...
...a simple proof that shows that certain conic sections are ellipses.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used in the proof below:
^ x  + <= x=h .'  `. /  \ .  .    .  . \  / `.  .´ y <+ <= x=0 Cone (side view): . /\ /  \ /b  \ /+´ <= x = h / ´ \ / ´  \ / ´  \ x = 0 => ´+\ / a  \
Proof:
r(x) = a  ((ab)/h)x and d(x) = a  ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2  d(x)^2 = ab  ab(2x/h  1)^2 = ab(1  4(x  h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x  h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
======================================================
@Archie: Yes, this proves that (certain) cone sections "as depicted in my diagram" are ellipses.
=> Appolonius was right.
Note, Archie, that there is no reference to Dandelin Spheres whatsoever.
Still not convinced? Can you point out an error in my simple calculation (of the shape of the coneic section) above?



