Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted:
Oct 5, 2017 7:24 AM


????? ?????????????? 5 ?????? ?.?. 2017 18 ?????? 20 ???? 43 ?????? UTC+7, John Gabriel ????????: > On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 18:03:53 UTC4, John Gabriel wrote: > > Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBOsXf_UIg > > > > Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. > > > > Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. > > > > gilstrang@gmail.com (MIT) > > huizenga@psu.edu (HARVARD) > > andersk@mit.edu (MIT) > > david.ullrich@math.okstate.edu (David Ullrich) > > djoyce@clarku.edu > > markcc@gmail.com > > The conclusion is that Euler's definition is illformed and the orangutans of the past 300 years have shame written all over their stupid faces.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=883010801853912&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theater



