
Re: Only one stupid (Zelos Malum) is still claiming that m+n is not a factor of f(x+n)f(xm).
Posted:
Nov 11, 2017 12:01 PM


>Liar. You haven't pointed out even ONE!
I did, you merely assumes it.
>If you knew what are proofs, then you would have known.
I know what you think is a proof, but that is not an actual proof.
>None of these functions are counterexamples. Get off your arse and read my beige articles. Chuckle.
Then do them weakling, or are you too much of a chicken?
>In a sense it is! If we consider only rational numbers then that statement is true also. A product of factors which are rational numbers, but that is too advanced a concept for you. Chuckle. In fact, the idea of factor can be extended to real number also given the definition in the dictionary, that is
That however renders the concept moot as it is applicable everywhere. I cn say "y is factor of nything" because we have x=y*(x/y). Which is meaningless.
>Now in algebra there are some things called symbols which represent variables. We work with these variables often without knowing whether they are rational numbers or not!
How cute, acting like you are trying to teach :) Considering I am more knowledgable than you you have nothing to teach me.

