Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » geometry.pre-college.independent

Topic: Re: Cabri n'est-il qu'un jouet?
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Michael Thwaites

Posts: 19
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Cabri n'est-il qu'un jouet?
Posted: Jul 1, 1993 6:30 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Peter Appelbaum said:

>If it is like the sketchpad, and I know about Sketchpad, should I still want
>to find out more about it? I mean, are there any differences that you could
>tell me about?


I use both Sketchpad and Cabri. There are reasons for using both. I have
intended to write out a full comparison of both but have not been able to
get around to it. I have time for a few rough points.

First, before anyone flames me, understand that I like these programs a
lot. Enough that I have bought copies of both of these programs out of my
own pocket and for my own use. I do geometry for fun (read passion), not
for work. Any examples I give below are indended to bring out an issue and
are not intended to imply there is only one way to do the particular
construction. Now that we are passed the disclaimers...

Sketchpad has about twice as much functionality than Cabri. This, of
course, is a subjective statement at best, but is my earnest estimate. For
instance, Sketchpad has facility for doing demo's on student machines,
supports color and shading, etc.

However, there are three features for which I prefer Cabri. First, Cabri
can prove things for you. You can do a construction and ask Cabri if three
points are collinear and it will tell you if in general if they are or are
not. If not, most of the time offer you a counter example. This blows me
away. This makes Cabri worth its price alone.

Second, Cabri recognizes when two points are the same, although they may
have been defined through different constructions. I think this feature is
required to allow Cabri to check properties (like collinearity &
membership) for you. In any case, this issue can cause you subtle
difficulties in constructions. Try this: Construct a circle with center O.
Place a point A on the circle and draw a line through A and O. Intersect
the line with the circle. In Cabri there are now two points on the circle.
In Sketchpad there are three - two points are at the location of A, A and a
new one constructed from the intersection. There are situations where
having these duplicate points has caused me trouble.

The third feature is a interface issue. It has to do with whether you
select a tool first or the objects of the tool first. Macintosh interface
guidelines aside, when I draw a line through two points with a ruler and
paper, I pick up the ruler and then line it up on the points and draw the
line. This is the way Carbi works. In Sketchpad you pick the points and
then select the line operation from the menu. Although I have learned to
anticipate this requirement, this is counter intuitive and requires me to
use more key strokes.

That was it for the short time I have. I would like to hear what others
have to say? Anyone else use both? Are there plans to make Sketchpad or
Cabri more like the other?

Michael Thwaites, UC-DLA






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.