Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » ncsm-members

Topic: CA State Supt. Race
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry P. Becker

Posts: 13,815
Registered: 12/3/04
CA State Supt. Race
Posted: Oct 26, 1998 11:11 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Sacramento Bee [Metro Final Edition], October 21, 1998, p. B9

Some school choice -- Status quo vs. the wrecking crew

Peter Schrag Column

Delaine Eastin, running for re-election as state superintendent of public
instruction, faces a simple problem. Everyone and his brother is beating up
on the schools that she is supposed to be in charge of, and while she
controls almost nothing, she has that mind-numbing title.

Right now she leads her opponent by a shrinking margin of 28 percent to 18
percent in the Field Poll -- some polls have the margin even slimmer --
with "dunno" far ahead of both. For an incumbent, that is nothing to cheer
about.

Running against her is an Orange County schoolteacher, Gloria Matta
Tuchman, who has embraced virtually every conservative shibboleth about
public education ever conceived, but has done nothing to show that she
could run a major state agency.

Tuchman likes vouchers, opposes social promotion and, as the co-author of
Proposition 227, the anti-bilingual initiative passed in June, doesn't want
to let schools teach kids in their primary language, even if they know no
English. Tuchman, candidata para jefe de las escuelas estatales, has a
bilingual Web site on the Internet.

Eastin's biggest source of money is the California Teachers Association and
other elements of the school establishment; most of Tuchman's comes from
the voucher crowd. The status quo vs. the wrecking crew. What a choice.

Compounding the problem for everyone is an upside-down school governance
structure that invites controversy and sabotage. Tuchman accuses Eastin --
correctly in many cases -- of getting in the way of the curricular reform
decisions of the appointed state school board. She says she would implement
the board's policies.

But what would she do if the board were appointed, not by a Republican such
as Gov. Pete Wilson, but by a wholly owned subsidiary of the CTA such as
Gray Davis, which, given Davis' lead in the polls, is highly likely?
Suppose the board revised the controversial State Testing and Research
(STAR) program test to make it fuzzier and friendlier? Would she, as the
bearer of tougher standards, cheerfully implement that decision? Could she
work any better with Davis than Eastin has with Wilson?

Eastin claims that she was pushing for class-size reduction and a longer
school year well before Wilson wrapped himself in these things. But he's
the governor and has the power -- and thus the ability to claim credit, if
credit is deserved. And if truth be told, a lot of people were there before
Eastin. Nor did she lead the push for the reform of the state's reading
program, as she claims; she was dragged to it.

Still, when a politically appointed board is supposed to make policy for an
independently elected superintendent, conflict is inevitable. And since
California's 1,000 elected district boards are supposed to set local school
policy, accountability becomes even more confused. If politics were
rational, this election would be about abolishing the state superintendent
as an elected office, not about picking yet another one, much less adding
yet another bureaucracy, as proposed by Proposition 8.

But that's only part of the confusion. While voters say they're interested
in education, few have any idea of what's going on in the schools; they
don't know that California's school funding is far below the national
average, and the lowest among the major industrial states. And if they
believe the rhetoric coming from the politicians and most of the media,
they're certain that they're in a great educational wasteland producing
graduates none of whom can read or get a decent job.

That's hardly the whole picture, either in this state or nationally. Far
more students than ever are taking the core academic courses required for
admission to the University of California; many more are taking and passing
advanced placement courses. And while SAT verbal scores for graduating
seniors preparing to enter selective colleges are up only slightly in the
past decade, math scores are at their highest point since 1973-74, despite
the fact that many more students are taking the test. UC President Richard
Atkinson says today's entering UC freshmen are far better prepared than
their predecessors.

None of those things mitigates the dismal performance of California fourth-
and eighth-graders on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or
the state's worrisome dropout rate, which, as The Bee's Deb Kollars
recently reported, is a good deal higher than the phony numbers touted by
Eastin and the state Department of Education. Nor does it mitigate the
rigidity and bureaucratic arrogance of many schools and districts.

But given the high concentrations of limited-English-speaking kids in the
state's classrooms -- roughly one of every four California students; given
the chronically high child poverty rate; given the high rates of
transiency; and given a 20-year history of underfunding and public
indifference, it's surprising that California does as well as it has been
doing.

For 20 years we've systematically starved the schools -- of facilities,
books, libraries, laboratories, counselors, nurses. We've let buildings
rot, watched the quality of the teaching force decline and, in the face of
general indifference, allowed teachers unions and deadbeats to run many of
our districts. For nearly a decade, we were without a statewide test. Why
are we surprised that we stink in so many areas?

In the end, Eastin will probably win, in part because she has more money
for last-minute TV time and slate mailers, in part because Tuchman's only
real strength is that she's not the incumbent. Who in her right mind would
want this office?

The best course would be to abolish it, turn the superintendent into a
gubernatorial appointee and thus make clear to all that the governor has
the accountability that his power already gives him. Eastin deserves to
take the rap for a lot of things. But most of those now looking for a
target to blame for our 20-year record of neglect ought to look in the
mirror first.
*****************************************************
Jerry P. Becker
Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL 62901-4610 USA
Fax: (618)453-4244
Phone: (618)453-4241 (office)
E-mail: JBECKER@SIU.EDU





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.