Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Re:Technology in the classroom
Replies: 6   Last Post: Mar 10, 1995 11:06 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Chih-Han sah

Posts: 75
Registered: 12/3/04
Re:Technology in the classroom
Posted: Mar 9, 1995 7:11 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I would like to thank Cindy Chapman for her game of beating
the calculator. Unfortunately, there are a number of horror stories
from various directions about the excessive dependence on the use of
calculators. Here are some examples:

1. From the flagship university of Texas at Austin, a faculty
member was chatting with a student about the calculus course. That
student said the course was going okay for him but there was an episode
he wanted to mention. It seemed that he was in a group project with
about 10 other students in an Engineering project. At one point, they
needed to take the average of 0.12 and 0.12. The group leader whipped
out his graphing calculator and punched in 0.12 + 0.12/2 and got the
answer of 0.18. Everyone was ready to put down 0.18 in their report
until this student said: "Hey, fellows, the average of 0.12 and 0.12 is
0.12!". In chorus, the group members said: Yeah, we thought so too,
but the computer said it was 0.18!. This particular student had to go
through the entire process and explain to the group that division was
done first on the calculator. At that point, the group members were
finally convinced that they should put down the answer 0.12.

2. Another colleague reported that engineering students in
his class no longer knew how to divide by 10 without the aid of a
pocket calculator. One student in the class was able to divide by 2,
but not by 10.

3. Last summer, I was asked to mentor two high school students
working on math projects for a math fair. Both are very bright. One
worked on a maximum-minimum problem in geometry. To get a rough idea
of what was happening, I asked him to examine some numerical examples.
He had to look at an inequality where one side was sqrt(3) and the other
side was bigger than 2. At this point, he whipped out his pocket
calculator. The second student was working on some problems involving
continued fractions. Again, to check out some simple examples, he
whipped out his calculators. In both cases, the line of thought was
broken and we had to start all over again.

Of course, calculators are useful when dealing with long
calculations. They should be viewed as a "supplementary tool" that
should be used *at the appropriate* place. Above all, the user has
to understand the problem of *round off errors*. The main shortcoming
of a pocket calculator is the fact that the display window only shows
a limited amount of information and the user has very little idea if
an error had crept in and there is no easy way to see just what basic
fact was not mastered by a student.

On a recent exam. students in a beginning math course were
asked to write down the value of sin(15 degrees). A hint was given
that 15 = 45- 30 and the addition formula for sine and cosine were
prominently displayed on the blackboard. Calculators were permitted.

Many students wrote down the answer 0.2588 and received full
credit for the problem. Many others wrote down:

sin(15) = sin(45) - sin(30) = 0.2071

and received no credit. It was not a good test problem. For all one
can tell, many of the students who punched into the calculator sin(15)
received the correct answer may still believe that sin(15) = sin(45)-sin(30).

Han Sah

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.