The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: "by type" and Problem solving
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 10, 1995 1:22 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
John Fibelkorn

Posts: 18
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: "by type" and Problem solving
Posted: Dec 10, 1995 12:27 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

How about this analogy: Let's say you have a heart problem. Now you have a
choice of two doctors. Doctor A spent time in medical school, internship,
etc. and specializes in cardiovascular problems. Many times he has
pinpointed the problem in cases like yours and has performed hundreds of
successful surgeries. Doctor B is kind of a general practitioner and has
never heard of a case like yours, but he is sure by his ability to reason
and solve other medical problems he can help you out.

Which doctor do you want, Doctor A or Doctor B?

>At 6:53 PM 12/9/95, wrote:
>>In a message dated 95-12-09 16:12:55 EST, you write:

>>>To teach problem solving effectively teachers must place emphasis on
>>>developing the child's abiltiy to reason and solve problems. Teaching

>>>solving requires teachers to abandon the linear progresssion of most math
>>>lessons from skill instruction to "problem soving" and create an

>>>where there is interplay among reason, problem solving and skill
>>>Teachers must create lessons where children can learn a variety of
>>Nice words, but this doesn't take into account reality. Most students need
>>some instruction just to get a feel for what's going on and there is nothing
>>wrong with a little dril l to make the students feel comfortable in the arena
>>of problem solving.

>I'd like to welcome M Botula as an intelligent, articulate addition to this
>I'd also like to remind Mr. Lutemann that HIS reality is just that: his.
>Perhaps his students warm to "a little drill"; then again, perhaps it's
>merely his sense of reality that helps him to that belief. I'm not opposed
>to "a little drill" but can't help but suspect that my sense of "little" in
>this context is not universely shared. Why is that such a difficult notion
>for some folks to entertain: each of us brings certain assumptions to the
>party, but not all of us assume that ours are THE correct ones.
>As to what "most" students "need": another example of gross
>overgeneralization based on what I suspect is rather limited perspective. I
>would have no objection to Kent (or anyone) citing specific evidence from
>his teaching practice to support his perceptions. But these off-the-cuff
>claims to universality don't carry much weight in my estimation.
>|Michael Paul Goldenberg
>|University of Michigan 310 E. Cross St.
>|School of Education 4002 Ypsilanti, MI 48198
>|Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259 (313) 482-9585
>|(313) 747-2244
>|"Truth is a mobile army of metaphors."
>|Friedrich Nietzsche

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.